Reminds me of how that low-IQ con artist Ibram Kendi tweeted an unwitting own-goal about how evil white kids were pretending to have a racial identity other than white on their college applications, and then when it was pointed out to him that this suggests it is advantageous to be nonwhite and thus undercut the major premise of his entire grift, he just deleted his tweet. I'm sure the phenomenon of whites, especially males, identifying as nonwhite will increase in response to the incessant propaganda about whiteness being an unpardonable sin and in response to all our culture's most important institutions actively favoring nonwhites. Who knows, maybe someday we can get back to that whole "content of their character" metric as the ideal for judging people.
No, I think Auron is right. They’ll identify as some flavour of Qwerty - those boundaries are not gatekept at all, though plain old gay doesn't have much currency any more.
Those people above settled on their ethnic claims ten, even 5 years ago - before the gender lobby tightened their grip. You wouldn't chance fudging your race these days but if you ever got a tingle from from some unorthodox porn you could probably convince *yourself* you're queer and who can challenge that?
You're probably right in most cases. "Nonbinary" or "queer" or some variant thereof will no doubt be the identity of choice, but I'm pretty sure we'll also have white people trying to pass as nonwhite, especially Native American.
When the incentives are high, the hucksters reply...reminds me of tele-evangelists in the 80's...they weren't true Believers and were cynically grifting the the Faith, which was in some ascension at the time; Christian Coalition, et al.
Colonialism was evil. Exterminating native Americans was evil. This cannot be refuted unless one argues from a Christian perspective, but most Christians agree that it was wrong, even if the intentions of some participants may have been honorable.
So, in order to reverse the anti-white narrative outlined by the OP, there are three options: 1) Admit that the whites who were sent to the New World did so under duress and that their masters were members of a certain perfidious tribe who still rule over us today (which is taboo); 2) Claim that “might is right” and primitive cultures were not noble savages but inferior peoples who deserved to be wiped out (which would be unpopular); or 3) Adopt a highly aggressive form of Christian nationalism whose creed is that nonbelievers must be subjugated by force (which would be unpopular).
Reminds me of how that low-IQ con artist Ibram Kendi tweeted an unwitting own-goal about how evil white kids were pretending to have a racial identity other than white on their college applications, and then when it was pointed out to him that this suggests it is advantageous to be nonwhite and thus undercut the major premise of his entire grift, he just deleted his tweet. I'm sure the phenomenon of whites, especially males, identifying as nonwhite will increase in response to the incessant propaganda about whiteness being an unpardonable sin and in response to all our culture's most important institutions actively favoring nonwhites. Who knows, maybe someday we can get back to that whole "content of their character" metric as the ideal for judging people.
No, I think Auron is right. They’ll identify as some flavour of Qwerty - those boundaries are not gatekept at all, though plain old gay doesn't have much currency any more.
Those people above settled on their ethnic claims ten, even 5 years ago - before the gender lobby tightened their grip. You wouldn't chance fudging your race these days but if you ever got a tingle from from some unorthodox porn you could probably convince *yourself* you're queer and who can challenge that?
You're probably right in most cases. "Nonbinary" or "queer" or some variant thereof will no doubt be the identity of choice, but I'm pretty sure we'll also have white people trying to pass as nonwhite, especially Native American.
No doubt. But the risk/benefit ratio has tilted recently.
(Job Application)
Please specify your race:
1)African American
2)White Devil
3)Hispanic or Latino
4)I prefer not to say because I'm white and don't want my application to be disregarded immediately.
When the incentives are high, the hucksters reply...reminds me of tele-evangelists in the 80's...they weren't true Believers and were cynically grifting the the Faith, which was in some ascension at the time; Christian Coalition, et al.
Colonialism was evil. Exterminating native Americans was evil. This cannot be refuted unless one argues from a Christian perspective, but most Christians agree that it was wrong, even if the intentions of some participants may have been honorable.
So, in order to reverse the anti-white narrative outlined by the OP, there are three options: 1) Admit that the whites who were sent to the New World did so under duress and that their masters were members of a certain perfidious tribe who still rule over us today (which is taboo); 2) Claim that “might is right” and primitive cultures were not noble savages but inferior peoples who deserved to be wiped out (which would be unpopular); or 3) Adopt a highly aggressive form of Christian nationalism whose creed is that nonbelievers must be subjugated by force (which would be unpopular).