Correct, and the problem can only get worse. This is the consequence of a society that was so debased that it gullibly and naïvely bought into the bullshit of ‘equality of opportunity’ as being not just an achievable goal, but a desirable one! The reality is, of course, the can be no ‘equality of opportunity’ under any circumstance. That’s axiomatic to anybody with a rational, functioning brain. By our very nature, our innate human diversity, excludes that possibility .
The problem with expecting the notion of ‘equality of opportunity’ to work is, how do you measure it? Well, the way you determine whether you’ve achieved ‘equality of opportunity’ is by observing an ‘equality of outcome’. After all, if we are ‘all equal’ LOL!!!! i.e. we homogeneous and NON-diverse, then we should see an ‘equality of outcomes’. Since this equality of outcome cannot, indeed will not ever happen, it must be forced upon us so that the failed “progressive“ worldview is to appear to work. We are now in that phase of enforcing ‘equality of outcome’.
There is absolutely no way for any of this to end well.
My first job out of college was for the main contractor who ran a Department of Energy site. What was referred to then as "Diversity Training" was required for all employees. That was 1998. This has been going on for 25 years.
Even if you chose only the best and brightest in their fields, I still don't want this Progressive model of governance. This was the experiment Woodrow Wilson and his ilk took very seriously (and it got you forced drafts, income tax, and the Fed as an opening.) The problem is that human experts are still human...and we don't know $hit as a species. We're just a bunch of monkeys with machine guns.
The only revolt of students that I see is against Jewish supremacy privilege.
Who do you think set up the expert system and consensus. Just like the election system and federal court system, it is masonic and hierarchical so that it can be controlled secretly. Why does anyone need to be ruled by others.
Jesse Kelly refers to this as "the death of everything" and he is correct. A good example of this is China. In China more babies are born with a genius level IQ in a month than are born in the U.S. in a year, yet they send their best and brightest to the free world schools to learn and conduct research and steal our intellectual property. Why is that? Because China is a monolithic totalitarian culture were if you step out of the box you suffer severe consequences, in other words they cannot innovate their culture punishes that. This is now becoming the same in the free world in general and in the U.S. specifically.
And yet, we can't cure hiccups.
Correct, and the problem can only get worse. This is the consequence of a society that was so debased that it gullibly and naïvely bought into the bullshit of ‘equality of opportunity’ as being not just an achievable goal, but a desirable one! The reality is, of course, the can be no ‘equality of opportunity’ under any circumstance. That’s axiomatic to anybody with a rational, functioning brain. By our very nature, our innate human diversity, excludes that possibility .
The problem with expecting the notion of ‘equality of opportunity’ to work is, how do you measure it? Well, the way you determine whether you’ve achieved ‘equality of opportunity’ is by observing an ‘equality of outcome’. After all, if we are ‘all equal’ LOL!!!! i.e. we homogeneous and NON-diverse, then we should see an ‘equality of outcomes’. Since this equality of outcome cannot, indeed will not ever happen, it must be forced upon us so that the failed “progressive“ worldview is to appear to work. We are now in that phase of enforcing ‘equality of outcome’.
There is absolutely no way for any of this to end well.
My first job out of college was for the main contractor who ran a Department of Energy site. What was referred to then as "Diversity Training" was required for all employees. That was 1998. This has been going on for 25 years.
Even if you chose only the best and brightest in their fields, I still don't want this Progressive model of governance. This was the experiment Woodrow Wilson and his ilk took very seriously (and it got you forced drafts, income tax, and the Fed as an opening.) The problem is that human experts are still human...and we don't know $hit as a species. We're just a bunch of monkeys with machine guns.
The only revolt of students that I see is against Jewish supremacy privilege.
Who do you think set up the expert system and consensus. Just like the election system and federal court system, it is masonic and hierarchical so that it can be controlled secretly. Why does anyone need to be ruled by others.
Jesse Kelly refers to this as "the death of everything" and he is correct. A good example of this is China. In China more babies are born with a genius level IQ in a month than are born in the U.S. in a year, yet they send their best and brightest to the free world schools to learn and conduct research and steal our intellectual property. Why is that? Because China is a monolithic totalitarian culture were if you step out of the box you suffer severe consequences, in other words they cannot innovate their culture punishes that. This is now becoming the same in the free world in general and in the U.S. specifically.
I pose the question again, will the Managerial Class be able to 'put the Woke Away'? Or would that be like The Church putting the Holy Spirit away?
LOL!!! of course she can. That is one of the fundamental assumptions of our entire era.
Indeed!!! I stand corrected. Thank you for pointing that out. 😂